Catalog/SEO health/CMS/Gatsby
SEO health · Gatsby

Gatsby SEO Health: median 65/100 (17 sites)

Across 17 Gatsby sites the median SEO health is 65, based on real Crawlinx audits.

65/100
median SEO health
65–67
middle 50% (p25–p75)
53–81
full range (min–max)
17
sites benchmarked
65/100median SEO health across 17 Gatsby sites
Distribution across the sample
53
Min
65
25th pct
65
Median
67
75th pct
81
Max
Most common issues in this segment
IssueSites affectedShare
Images without width/height (layout shift / CLS)17100%
Low text-to-HTML ratio1694%
Missing <h1>1482%
No structured data detected1482%
Meta description too long1376%
Best & worst in class
SitePagesHealth
later.com best in class 50 81
userway.org best in class 50 75
fastly.com best in class 50 72
gammaaex.net best in class 29 71
lucidchart.com worst in class 50 53
fenneccreative.com worst in class 13 58
paultommo.com worst in class 50 63
mode.com worst in class 50 63

SEO health is a 0–100 score Crawlinx computes from 157 technical checks run on every crawled page — indexability, titles and meta descriptions, canonical and hreflang correctness, internal linking, redirects, broken links and Core Web Vitals signals. A site scores high only when the whole crawl is clean, so a single median hides a spread worth reading below.

Across 17 Gatsby sites the median SEO health is 65, with the middle half falling between 65 (25th percentile) and 67 (75th percentile). The full range runs from 53 to 81. The tight range means most sites in this segment cluster near the median, so a score much below it points to a site-specific misconfiguration rather than a platform-wide limitation.

Because these sites share the Gatsby platform, they inherit the same defaults — its templating, URL structure, sitemap and meta handling — which is why they cluster. The remaining variance is down to theme, plugins and how each team configured them, so the most common issues below are the ones Gatsby does not solve out of the box and every Gatsby site owner should verify.

The single most common problem here is “Images without width/height (layout shift / CLS)”, present on 100% of the sample, followed by “Low text-to-HTML ratio” and “Missing <h1>”. The full ranking is in the table above — fix the top of that list first, since it is the fault most likely to be dragging this segment's median down.

All sites in this benchmark
Site
acbcoop.com
fastly.com
fenneccreative.com
fullstory.com
gammaaex.net
kellierichardson.com
later.com
lucidchart.com
mode.com
paultommo.com
preset.io
quoteforautos.com
ralphdsilvanissan.com.au
sealworks.com
two4seven.com.au
userway.org
youtalk.ru
Related
acbcoop.com fastly.com fenneccreative.com fullstory.com gammaaex.net kellierichardson.com later.com lucidchart.com mode.com paultommo.com preset.io quoteforautos.com ralphdsilvanissan.com.au sealworks.com two4seven.com.au userway.org youtalk.ru SEO health CMS Catalog

Audit your own site — free

157 checks, internal PageRank, render-diff. No signup, results in ~30s.

Scan your site →