Catalog/SEO health
SEO health benchmarks

SEO Health Benchmark: median 65/100 (14202 sites)

Median SEO health is 65 across 14202 audited sites, benchmarked by CMS, gatekeeper, vertical and country.

65/100
median SEO health
64–65
middle 50% (p25–p75)
30–94
full range (min–max)
14202
sites benchmarked
65/100median SEO health across 14202 audited sites
Distribution across the sample
30
Min
64
25th pct
65
Median
65
75th pct
94
Max
Most common issues in this segment
IssueSites affectedShare
Missing recommended security headers1260388%
Images without width/height (layout shift / CLS)1183383%
Legacy image format (jpg/png/gif) with no next-gen fallback1173082%
Missing Open Graph tags1135879%
No Last-Modified header (no conditional GET for unchanged pages)1085276%
Best & worst in class
SitePagesHealth
gabicakes.shop best in class 50 94
oseiwa.co.jp best in class 27 94
precivale.com.br best in class 42 94
winkworthplc.com worst in class 50 30
thenunezgroup.com worst in class 50 30
thelatinxcollective.com worst in class 50 30

SEO health is a 0–100 score Crawlinx computes from 157 technical checks run on every crawled page — indexability, titles and meta descriptions, canonical and hreflang correctness, internal linking, redirects, broken links and Core Web Vitals signals. A site scores high only when the whole crawl is clean, so a single median hides a spread worth reading below.

Across 14202 the audited sites the median SEO health is 65, with the middle half falling between 64 (25th percentile) and 65 (75th percentile). The full range runs from 30 to 94. That wide gap says the segment is not uniformly good or bad — platform defaults set a baseline, but individual configuration decides where a site lands. Compare your own score against the 75th percentile, not the median, to see what a well-run peer looks like.

The single most common problem here is “Missing recommended security headers”, present on 88% of the sample, followed by “Images without width/height (layout shift / CLS)” and “Legacy image format (jpg/png/gif) with no next-gen fallback”. The full ranking is in the table above — fix the top of that list first, since it is the fault most likely to be dragging this segment's median down.

Compare by segment

CMS

View breakdown →

Category

View breakdown →

Related
Category CMS Catalog

Audit your own site — free

157 checks, internal PageRank, render-diff. No signup, results in ~30s.

Scan your site →